Friday, 5 October 2012

'Please don't get in the van': Friend begged April Jones not to get in kidnapper's vehicle Officers are quizzing a 46-year-old man, named locally as Mark Bridger, who was arrested in the town where April was abducted - By Richard Smith, Luke Traynor, Ada

Mirror

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/april-jones-missing-friend-begged-1357238

 

 

APRIL JONES MISSING'Please don't get in the van': Friend begged April Jones not to get in kidnapper's vehicle

Officers are quizzing a 46-year-old man, named locally as Mark Bridger, who was arrested in the town where April was abducted

Lost girl: April Jones in the same purple coat she wore on MondayLost girl: April Jones in the same purple coat she wore on Monday
PA

The best friend of snatched April Jones begged her not to get into the van in which she was driven off by a kidnapper.

As police and neighbours last night continued the hunt for the missing five-year-old, an RAF search and rescue helicopter was scrambled to a “very specific ­location” at short notice with police on board.

Officers were also quizzing a 46-year-old man who was arrested yesterday in the townwhere April was abducted.

Do you know Mark Bridger? Ring us free on 0800 282 591

Mum-of-two Vicky Fenner told how the two close friends had been playing together when the kidnapper struck.

The 25-year-old added: “The two girls went out together and we’ve been told by the seven-year-old that April got into a vehicle parked behind the garages.

"It was wet and cold and the other girl told April not to get into it. But April said: ‘It’s all right, I know them’.

“I think the girl was the only person who was with April. She is the last person to see her.

“I was told April was in the same vehicle two or three days ago. On that occasion three children got into the vehicle but one girl is denying it.”

April’s friend said she climbed into a left-hand drive van willingly.

The arrested man was named locally as Mark Bridger, a swimming pool attendant.

Neighbours say he has a daughter about April’s age.

 

Mark BridgerArrested: Mark Bridger 

 

He was held walking on a road near the town.

Police later found his vehicle nearby and took it for examination.

April’s devastated parents Coral, 40, and 43-year-old Paul said in a ­statement directed at whoever had taken her: “Please, if you have our little girl, let her come home to us.”

Shocked residents on the Mid Wales estate where the girl was snatched told how their quiet community has been ­shattered by the abduction.

And they said they previously had no fears about letting children play outside because the area was considered very safe.

Vicky added: “I’ve grown up on this estate and we all thought this was the safest place in the world for kids to play.

"April goes past my house 20 times a day with her friend. This is such a shock because everybody looks out for everyone else’s children and we all know what is going on.”

Another mother added: “We always thought this was the best place in the world to bring up kids. This is like taking the innocence away from our town. April is tiny and so sweet.

“It’s shocking isn’t it. They are a nice, normal family.”

The youngster was snatched on the Bryn y Gog estate in Machynlleth, Powys at 7pm on Monday.

Police, coastguard, mountain rescuers and the RAF were ­concentrating their search for her along the banks of a river.

The RAF Sea King flew from the same base on Anglesey where Prince William is based. He was not involved in the search operation.

Powys Chief ­Superintendent Reg Bevan, leading the hunt for the girl who was wearing her favourite purple knee-length coat when she disappeared, said last night: “April is still missing and all lines of inquiry are ­continuing with the view she is alive.”

 

Aprils parents Paul Jones and CoralParents: Paul and Coral are said to be "shattered"
Wales News Service

 

See live updates as the search for missing April Jones continues

Last night detectives said they were examining a left-hand drive Land Rover Discovery.

People who knew the arrested man claim he had a similar vehicle.

Officers have carefully quizzed April’s friends to piece together the moments before she was snatched and to get a description of the kidnapper.

Superintendent Ian John confirmed the main witness was a seven-year-old girl.

He added: “She saw her walking ­willingly into the van on the driver’s side.

"We are treating the witness with a great deal of sensitivity and specialist officers trained to deal with children are slowly and precisely ­interviewing her.”

Mr Bevan added: “The indications are that April got into the vehicle ­willingly. There’s nothing to suggest at this stage there was a struggle.”

April lives with her parents, sister Jasmine, 16, and brother Harley, nine.

Neighbour Gareth Jones, 51, told how 45 minutes after she vanished, Coral turned up at his house in tears asking: “Have you seen my daughter?”

He added: “Coral was totally distraught. She was in pieces.

“This is totally shocking. We come from a quiet mid-Wales town. We wanted to do anything to help. The way everyone has stepped up is amazing.”

Another parent told how she joined the search party looking for April as soon as it became clear she had vanished.

The mum said: “It is very scary and I can’t even imagine what Coral and Paul are going through. It’s heart-wrenching and horrible.”

 

People searching in fields around Machynlleth, Mid Wales, for missing girl April JonesRallying round: Hundreds of volunteers helped the search
PA
 

 

More than 500 people yesterday joined police to help in the search.

They spent the night scouring every road within a 25-mile radius of the town.

Mum-of-two Helen Roberts told how Harley banged on her door pleading for help after his sister went missing.

The 43-year-old, who is a dinner school meals supervisor at the local primary where April is a pupil, said: “He said, ‘Please, please, please come and help me’.

"I went and grabbed my coat. Harley was in tears, he was frantic. He wanted everybody to help because he thinks the world of April because she is the youngest.

“April is a lovely, pretty little girl. She is always happy and has lots of friends. She is a great girl and always listens to me.

"I held her hand in the playground on Monday. She said, ‘What time’s dinner, Auntie Helen?’

“Everybody is confused about where she has been taken and who has taken her.

"There’s great sadness but we are hoping to find her safe and alive. We searched the school and estate.”

 

 

 

April’s godmother Mair Raftree joined the hunt for the youngster.

The 49-year-old said: “She is such an intelligent child there is no way she would get into a car with a stranger.

"She had to have known him. I cannot believe what is happening, no one can, we’re in a state of shock and we are all praying for a miracle.

"I spoke to April’s mum this morning and she is struggling to keep it together. Coral is at home now and she’s been told not to leave her house.”

Coral is a member of the junior school parent teachers association.

Paul used to own a hardware shop and is regularly seen out walking the family’s pet dog.

A vigil was last night being held at St Peters Church in Machynlleth where wellwishers prayed for April.

Neighbours said Bridger was a well-known figure in the small town.

One added: “Everyone around here knows him. He used to work as a lifeguard.”

Wayne Thomas, 32, once worked as a welder with the suspect.

He said: “I’m amazed he has been arrested for this.”

Bridger’s parents Pamela and Graham last night refused to comment at their home in Hailsham, East Sussex.

See live updates as the search for missing April Jones continues and see all the news on the April Jones case

 

 

 

Thursday, 4 October 2012

Missing 5 year old April Jones in Machynlleth Thu 04 Oct 2012 11:00 - Statement by Detective Superintendent Reg Bevan:

Home

http://www.dyfed-powys.police.uk/en/news/latest-news/201210/missing-5-year-old-april-jones-in-machynlleth

Missing 5 year old April Jones in Machynlleth

Thursday October 4th 2012 

11:00

Statement by Detective Superintendent Reg Bevan:

I would like to give you a brief update on progress of the investigation into the abduction of April Jones in Machynlleth.

The suspect Mark Bridger remains in police custody at Aberytsywth Police Station.

He appeared before magistrates this morning when an extension of 36 hours was granted to allow us to further question him.

We have until just before 5pm tomorrow before we either charge, release or apply for a further warrant of detention.

The investigation continues and our focus remains on finding April.

The investigative team will be further interviewing Mark Bridger today. We will be continuing to piece together his movements during the relevant times and looking to overlay what we glean from his interviews, witness accounts and sightings.

While there is a huge visible presence of police officers and search teams, there is also a significant team of officers working around the clock behind the scenes, assisting in developing that picture so we can map out to the best of our ability his movements.

This includes a vast amount of forensic analysis taking places which forms a crucial part of the investigation, however forensics alone will not solve this.

We need information from the public which may help us find April.

In particular we are looking to trace the movements of Mark Bridger between 6.30pm on Monday and 3.30pm on Tuesday and any sightings of him between these times.

In addition, if anyone had contact with him between these times, we would urge you to come forward.

By contact I mean any contact - including face to face, telephone, text or social media.

We also need information regarding the movements of the blue Land Rover Discovery registration number L503 MEP between Monday evening and Tuesday afternoon.

 

Statement by Superintendent Ian John:

We are appreciative of the support from volunteers who we know desperately want to assist in the search to find April, which remains our top priority.

We continue to implement the police led searches in partnership with other police forces from around the UK, which includes nationally recognised search advice, Mountain Rescue, Coastguard and other agencies.

We understand fully why people feel  the need  do something practical to get out and try to find April. We want to ensure that we do all we can to find her, and at the same time do nothing to jeopardise the effort to locate her.

We are consulting the National Police Search Centre to see how we can best use the untrained community volunteers to do this.

We want people to come forward to provide the volunteer search coordinators with their details and what skills and local knowledge they possess.

We have developed a set of questions which we want the coordinators in Machynlleth Leisure Centre to complete and feed to us.  This information will help us make a wider search more effective for us.

I also remind people to look at their immediate environment and search their gardens and outbuildings and let us know if they have any information that can help us locate April.  We can then process this information to help us in our on-going evaluation of our search priorities.

By way of reassurance we have the following specialist resources deployed now:

8 Specialist police search teams directed by 5 POLSA’s

6 Police Dog Handlers

Officers from Dyfed Powys Police Marine Unit

RAF Mountain Rescue Team, coordinating the Mountain Rescue response with Brecon Beacons & Dyfi Valley Mountain Rescue Teams, including 11 Search & Rescue Dogs

The Coastguard Search Team, RNLI

This is undoubtedly a large and complex search operation of it’s kind in recent policing history.

We will continue to do all that we can collectively to find April.

The three key messages for me are:

Volunteers are welcomed.

  • The police must co-ordinate the search activity to ensure integrity of the search operation.
  • Under Police co-ordination we can use volunteers at the right time, in the right place and utilise appropriate skills. This will maximise opportunities and prevent people attending when there may not be readily available tasks.

Tuesday, 2 October 2012

Researchers Examine How Characteristics of Automated Voice Systems Affect Users’ Experience By Michele Masterson on September 21, 2012

The personality and gender of the automated voices you hear when calling your credit card company or receiving directions from your GPS navigational system may have an unconscious effect on your perception of the technology.

Researchers Rochelle Edwards and Philip Kortum at Rice University have conducted a study focusing how the gender and tone selected for an IVR affects its user-friendliness in which participants interacted with a medical IVR that collected information about their health. Users responded to both male and female voices that spoke in different tones, such as upbeat, professional, or sympathetic, and were then asked to judge the system’s usability. Edwards and Kortum will present their paper, “He Says, She Says: Does Voice Affect Usability?” at an upcoming Human Factors and Ergonomics Society meeting,

Past studies have indicated that users are more responsive to actual human voices than to computer-generated voices, but little research has been completed on the role that voice characteristics play in user perceptions of the technology.

“We have been systematically looking at what affects user performance on IVRs for some time now,” said Kortum. “Voice is the major element in an IVR interface, as graphical elements are for a Web page, and this study was a first attempt to understand the impact voice might have on the perceived usability of such systems.”

The authors found that although IVRs with male voices tended to be perceived as more usable than those with female voices, they were not considered more trustworthy. The researchers encourage designers to take voice characteristics into consideration when developing future systems.

“Anyone who uses an IVR knows how frustrating they can be,” said Kortum. “Much of this frustration stems from poorly designed IVRs, not from the form of interface being intrinsically “bad.” This research shows that some simple modifications to the design of these systems can have an impact on the usability of voice interfaces.”

Source: The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Researchers Examine How Characteristics of Automated Voice Systems Affect Users’ Experience By Michele Masterson on September 21, 2012

The personality and gender of the automated voices you hear when calling your credit card company or receiving directions from your GPS navigational system may have an unconscious effect on your perception of the technology.

Researchers Rochelle Edwards and Philip Kortum at Rice University have conducted a study focusing how the gender and tone selected for an IVR affects its user-friendliness in which participants interacted with a medical IVR that collected information about their health. Users responded to both male and female voices that spoke in different tones, such as upbeat, professional, or sympathetic, and were then asked to judge the system’s usability. Edwards and Kortum will present their paper, “He Says, She Says: Does Voice Affect Usability?” at an upcoming Human Factors and Ergonomics Society meeting,

Past studies have indicated that users are more responsive to actual human voices than to computer-generated voices, but little research has been completed on the role that voice characteristics play in user perceptions of the technology.

“We have been systematically looking at what affects user performance on IVRs for some time now,” said Kortum. “Voice is the major element in an IVR interface, as graphical elements are for a Web page, and this study was a first attempt to understand the impact voice might have on the perceived usability of such systems.”

The authors found that although IVRs with male voices tended to be perceived as more usable than those with female voices, they were not considered more trustworthy. The researchers encourage designers to take voice characteristics into consideration when developing future systems.

“Anyone who uses an IVR knows how frustrating they can be,” said Kortum. “Much of this frustration stems from poorly designed IVRs, not from the form of interface being intrinsically “bad.” This research shows that some simple modifications to the design of these systems can have an impact on the usability of voice interfaces.”

Source: The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Supreme Court case tests US leadership in human rights - By Jodie A. Kirshner / October 1, 2012 - The Christian Science Monitor

'+'\x3C/scr'+'ipt>'); })();

Supreme Court case tests US leadership in human rights

Today the Supreme Court will assess whether US courts can hear lawsuits that pertain to events outside the country. If the justices eventually decide 'no,' an important avenue for redress will be closed to foreign victims of human-rights abuses – and America’s beacon will shine less brightly.

By Jodie A. Kirshner / October 1, 2012

The US Supreme Court is under a protective scrim, as work continued on the facade Sept. 27. Op-ed contributor Jodie A. Kirshner writes about the case the court will hear on the first day of its new term today: 'Between 1994 and 1995, [Barinem] Kiobel and other residents of the Ogoni region of Nigeria were arrested, tortured, convicted of murder in a sham trial, and shot.' With no redress in Nigeria, Kiobel's widow and survivors 'turned to the American courts.'

Alex Brandon/AP

Enlarge

New York

Sign up to receive the Opinion and Commentary newsletter every Thursday. You can also add Commentary to your daily Monitor newsletter.

Permissions

Flickr - projectbrainsaver

www.flickr.com
projectbrainsaver's A Point of View photoset projectbrainsaver's A Point of View photoset