Keep us a strong and independent voice for global justice: donate today!
Wikileaks
From Wikileaks
Jump to: navigation, searchFind other Wikileaks mirrors here
WikiLeaks
global defense of sources and press freedoms, circa now—3 January, 2011
Have documents the world needs to see?
We are of assistance to peoples of all countries who wish to reveal unethical behavior in their governments and institutions. We aim for maximum political impact.
Retrieved from "http://mirror.wikileaks.info/wiki/Wikileaks"
Views
Personal tools
In other languages
Saturday, 8 January 2011
Wikileaks - Wikileaks
Fusion Centers Gathering Much More Than Terrorism Data « Government Against The People
Fusion Centers Gathering Much More Than Terrorism Data
November 16, 2010 by flatcap
Inside the Miami-Dade fusion center
As we’ve said several times before, “weapons and tactics developed by the U.S. military for use in combat zones can and will be used domestically.” A corollary to that statement is: “Anti-terrorism measures developed for use against hypothetical bearded men hiding in caves can and will be used against American civilians.”
About a year ago, a police officer in Maryland noticed a truck loaded with plastic pallets driving down a main road in the early morning. He normally wouldn’t have given it a second look, but the officer had seen a bulletin from the state’s “coordination and analysis center” advising that such thefts were costing bakeries and grocers hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Sure enough, the pallets were stolen.
Cracking down on pallet thieves wasn’t quite the mission envisioned for “fusion centers,” 72 facilities across the country that were started after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorism attacks to improve information-sharing and threat analysis among local law enforcement.
The centers, which have received $426 million in federal funding since 2004, were designed as an early warning system against the next attack. Lately, amid the recent uptick in homegrown plots, the Homeland Security Department has been touting fusion centers as a means of thwarting domestic terrorism.
But it turns out that homegrown terrorism pales in frequency and fatalities compared with typical street crime, so many of the centers have begun collecting and distributing criminal intelligence, even of the most mundane kind.
Read more at the Los Angeles Times.
Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged Big government, Bill of Rights, City government abuse, Constitution, Constitutional rights, Constitutional violations, Control grid, Economic war, Federal authority, Federal control, Federal government, Federal tyranny, Government abuse, Government control, Police state, Privacy, Surveillance | Leave a Comment
Be the first to like this post.Leave a Reply
New Jersey Town Criminalizes Sleeping in Public « Government Against The People
Note that the police chief admits that the new ordinance is intended to harass people who have no home to go to. This is a good example of government kicking people who are already down. It’s also a good example of the selective enforcement of the law. We see selective enforcement all the time, usually when a government official or corporate officer is slapped on the wrist for committing an offense most of us would go to jail for. Outlawing sleeping in public is the same principle, played out at the bottom of the social ladder.
It’s also interesting that the two citizens quoted in this story speak perfect sense, while the government representative admits to flagrant injustice in the way in which the ordinance is to be enforced.
ROSELLE PARK, N.J. (1010 WINS) — Getting some shuteye in one New Jersey town could land you in hot water, depending on where you lay your head, 1010 WINS’ Steve Sandberg reports.
In Roselle Park, it is against the law and you could be fined or arrested for sleeping in public.
One resident couldn’t help but laugh when she heard the news.
“Isn’t that a little crazy? I mean, if you fall asleep, like if I were to sit down on this bench and wait for a bus and I fell asleep, that’s against the law?” she said. “Don’t you think that’s a little crazy?”
Even though that’s the letter of the law, Police Chief Paul Morrison said drowsy drivers and napping babies need not worry.
“This ordinance was amended to help assist the police in addressing the increasing problem of homeless people sleeping on benches,” Morrison said.
Business owners said they’re a nuisance and eyesore, but one resident disagreed with the adopted solution.
“It would be easier if they would help them out,” he said.
From CBS New York.
Property Rights: A Development Imperative
Posted by Lindsay Clinton on October 8, 2010
This story originally appeared in our October 8, 2010 e-magazine. Click here to subscribe.
For over a billion poor people in the developing world, changing their relationship to the land they live upon could measurably improve their quality of life. Granting access to land and legalizing rights to the land could lead to an increase in income, improve social security, and enhance opportunity.
Addressing the issue of property rights is also a key aspect of increasing economic growth of developing countries. In overlooking the role of land and land rights, have we neglected a key element in the fight to bring the poor out of poverty?
Much of the development dialogue of the last decade has focused on microfinance, and before that, on aid, infrastructure, and governance. And, indeed, all are important tools in poverty alleviation. But, we must also understand the development imperative of securing land and land tenure for the poor.
The majority of the poor live in rural areas where land is the key asset: a source of food security, income, credit, status, and power. Without fair distribution of land and secure rights, millions of poor people suffer, and the economies of developing countries lose the opportunity to realize billions of dollars in assets for growth and investment. Creating a unified system that enables access to land and land rights is an essential component of fighting poverty.
The Importance of Land in Poverty Alleviation
According to Tim Hanstad, President of the Rural Development Institute, there are 1.2 billion people worldwide who own or lease physical property for which they do not hold formal rights or documentation, or live without permanent homes or access to land altogether. Landlessness, a symbol of poverty in many developing countries, is a result of rapid population growth, lack of land, low agricultural productivity, arcane legal systems, and ineffective policies. Between 600 and 700 million people have access to land, but have insecure tenure. Another 400-500 million are completely landless.
Land rights are directly and indirectly linked to human rights, the welfare of women and girls, and the cyclical nature of poverty. Providing the poor with land, and/or helping them to legally secure the land they live and work upon has overwhelming affects on many other aspects of development and can alter many of the factors that currently lead to global instability:
- Identity: Acknowledging property rights goes hand in hand with identifying a man or a woman as a part of a community and country, a fundamental human right.
- Women’s Empowerment: Women produce 60-80% of food in developing countries, but own less than 5% of the land. If women had the same access to land and seeds that men do, agricultural productivity would go up by at least 20%. When women have secure rights to land, they invest more in nutrition and education for their children, they are more empowered in their household, and are much less likely to be victims of domestic abuse.
- Sustainable Growth and Climate Change Resilience: Secure access to land rights serves as an incentive to invest in the land with a long-term vision. Land users are more likely to manage resources carefully, and care for the land over time.
- Decrease Migration and Slow Urbanization: Legally recognized land ownership helps farmers increase their financial stability and reduces the likelihood of urban migration.
- Business Development: Land rights can enable entrepreneurs to transform land into collateral to access bank loans and start new businesses.
- Peace and Political Stability: Many conflicts are created by overlapping claims to land, which can lead to human strife, violence, land grabs and population displacement. Respect for property rights can contribute to greater peace and stability.
Property Rights and Economic Development
The argument that formal land rights could unlock potential for the poor and their countries’ economies was popularized by the Peruvian economist Hernando De Soto, in his book The Mystery of Capital (2000). Called the “blueprint for a new industrial revolution,” the book describes the process by which developing countries can transform themselves and their economies by creating a system that legally represents people and their property. De Soto writes, “Leaders of [developing countries] need not wander the world’s foreign ministries and international financial institutions seeking their fortune. In the midst of their own poorest neighborhoods and shantytowns, there are—if not acres of diamonds—trillions of dollars, all ready to be put to use if only the mystery of how assets are transformed into live capital can be unraveled.”
With recognized rights to land and physical assets, owners are brought into the formal economy. These resources become live capital to owners, enabling them to buy, sell, or leverage as collateral so that they are able to take advantage of their most significant asset. By recognizing and honoring rights to property and land, developing countries can unlock capital and create unparalleled opportunity for their citizens.
While the tenuous relationship between the land and the poor goes back centuries, there are recent examples of the potential that can result from land reform. In the 1980s, China provided broad-based access to private land ownership in rural households through its “Household Responsibility System .” This incentive system—which transformed China’s agricultural sector from collective to private production—increased yields, reallocated communal land to peasant households, and gave millions of smallholder farmers relative freedom over land use. The system lowered the number of people living in poverty from 542 million to 375 million within the decade.
In Taiwan, from 1949-1953, the land ownership framework was completely turned inside out, giving over 400,000 families land and title in a very short time. The reforms put the power of capital into the hands of many, instead of the few. The farmers suddenly had something they never had before: disposable income. As a result, farmers invested more time, money, and fertilizer in their lands, diversified crops, and increased production at an annual rate of 5.6% from 1953 through 1970.
Change Comes with Time
While many development tools address symptoms of poverty, taking on the issues of land rights gets at the root cause of poverty. Landlessness is one of the strongest predictors of poverty, more so than gender or caste. When land rights are in place, many other things fall into place, such as health, education, and income generation.
The process of changing systems to give the poor better access and secure rights to land will require innovative action, policy reform, and patience. Hanstad of the Rural Development Institute (RDI) has likened the process to banking reform: “Success in this field is measured in decades. We can’t expect change to happen quickly. You’re never exactly done.”
There are organizations and governments around the world that are conducting research, running community level pilots, and implementing dynamic programs that are contributing to change.
Last month, at the Clinton Global Initiative in New York City, the NIKE Foundation, Omidyar Network, and RDI together announced a US$6.5 million commitment to create opportunities for 50,000 poor, rural girls in Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia by helping to strengthen their rights to land. The pledge aims to bring needed attention to these issues.
Scenarios: Women, Land, and Rights
Having unequal and undefined rights brings insecurity to poor women and girls around the world.
Inheritance: In West Bengal, a young girl from a farming family fears a fate she has seen befall her sisters. With no legal inheritance rights, girls are often married off or pushed out of the home at a young age.
Unequal Rights: In Rwanda, a woman struggles to cultivate enough food on her small plot to feed five children. When her husband leaves her, he denies her access to the land. She is left to care for her children without any formal rights to the property that can support her family.
Landlessness: In Indonesia, a woman and her family live next to a rice paddy field, which they cultivate. Although they live on the land, plant the field, and harvest the crop, they do not own it, and are considered landless. Their lives are dependent upon the whim of the land owner—and are therefore subject to removal at any time.
Share!
One in six people in Japan are now 'poor'
While Tokyo, and Japan, may seem like the land of plenty, it is also home to millions living below the poverty line. AFP reports that the number is approaching an astonishing one in six, or more than 21 million people in a country of 128 million.
These people earn less than half the median household income, or less than US$1,830 per month per four-person family.
The worst affected are single women, the unemployed, and the elderly. Indeed, there has been an increase in crime by pensioners over recent years, possibly because they know that in prison, they will be taken care of.
When Japan went through an economic transformation from the 1960s until the 1990s, life-time employment was commonplace. But after two decades of relative stagnation, the appeal of a job for life among a young generation that already has it all, and the desire of companies to offer it, has been lost.
Homeless Japanese receive advice from a preacher in a Tokyo park'Freeters' struggle with a working life
Today the word "freeter" is commonplace. A combination of the English word "freelancer" and the German word "arbeiter" (worker) it is used to denote a younger generation who reject Japan's corporate culture in favor of a freer lifestyle that many see as common in the West and want to emulate.
The trouble is, it's hard to survive jumping from job to job in modern Japan.
Aya Abe, a researcher at the National Institute on Population and Social Security says, "Many on the brink of poverty fall over the edge because of the demise of family structures that once acted as a safety net."
While in the past several generations of one family would share a household and support each other, today many live alone. The rise of single monthers is noticeable.
Health and Labor ministry statistics show there are 1.23 million single-mother households in Japan, earning 40 percent of the average household income even after receiving benefits. As a result, an increasing number turn to prostitution to make ends meet.
New Prime Minister Naoto Kan used his first official speech to address the situation, stating he would aim to "reduce the factors that make people unhappy" in a country with a notoriously high suicide rate -- 32,845 people killed themselves in 2009 (26 out of every 100,000 people).
The true suicide rate is thought to be much higher than Japanese government statistics show. Suicide in Japan is largely attributed to the loss of a job and the social embarrassment it causes, making people particularly vulnerable during recessions.
via cnngo.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Flickr - projectbrainsaver
www.flickr.com
|
