What Can We Learn From The Portuguese Decriminalization of Illicit Drugs?

Skip Navigation

Oxford Journals

• Contact Us
• My Basket
• My Account

British Journal of Criminology

• About This Journal
• Contact This Journal
• Subscriptions
• View Current Issue (Volume 51 Issue 3 May 2011)
• Archive
• Search

• Oxford Journals
• Law & Social Sciences
• British Journal of Criminology
• Volume50, Issue6
• Pp. 999-1022.

What Can We Learn From The Portuguese Decriminalization of Illicit Drugs?

1. Caitlin Elizabeth Hughes* and
2. Alex Stevens

1. *Dr, Drug Policy Modelling Program, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW, NSW, Australia, 2052; caitlin.hughes@unsw.edu.au.

Abstract

The issue of decriminalizing illicit drugs is hotly debated, but is rarely subject to evidence-based analysis. This paper examines the case of Portugal, a nation that decriminalized the use and possession of all illicit drugs on 1 July 2001. Drawing upon independent evaluations and interviews conducted with 13 key stakeholders in 2007 and 2009, it critically analyses the criminal justice and health impacts against trends from neighbouring Spain and Italy. It concludes that contrary to predictions, the Portuguese decriminalization did not lead to major increases in drug use. Indeed, evidence indicates reductions in problematic use, drug-related harms and criminal justice overcrowding. The article discusses these developments in the context of drug law debates and criminological discussions on late modern governance.

Key words

• decriminalization
• Portugal
• drug
• policy
• legislation

• © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies (ISTD). All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents

This Article

1. Br J Criminol (2010) 50 (6): 999-1022. doi: 10.1093/bjc/azq038 First published online: July 21, 2010

1. » AbstractFree
2. Full Text (HTML)
3. Full Text (PDF)
4. All Versions of this Article:

   1. azq038v1
   2. 50/6/999 most recent

- Classifications

1. • Article

- Services

1. Alert me when cited
2. Alert me if corrected
3. Find similar articles
4. No Web of Science related articles
5. Add to my archive
6. Download citation
7. Request Permissions

+ Citing Articles

1. No citing articles
2. Citing articles via CrossRef
3. Citing articles via Scopus (2)
4. No Web of Science citing articles
5. Citing articles via Google Scholar

+ Google Scholar

1. Articles by Hughes, C. E.
2. Articles by Stevens, A.
3. Search for related content

+ Related Content

1. No related web pages

+ Share

2. • 

     CiteULike

   • 

     Connotea

   • 

     Delicious

   • 

     Facebook

   • 

     Twitter

   • 

     Mendeley

   What's this?

Current Issue

1. May 2011 51 (3)

1. 

1. Alert me to new issues

The Journal

• About this journal
• Reviewing Policy
• Publishers' Books for Review
• Rights & Permissions
• Dispatch date of the next issue

Published on behalf of

• Centre for Crime & Justice Studies

Impact factor: 1.068

Editor

Pat Carlen

• View full editorial board

For Authors

• Instructions to authors
• Self archiving policy

Alerting Services

• Email table of contents
• Email Advance Access
• CiteTrack
• XML RSS feed

Corporate Services

• Advertising sales
• Reprints
• Supplements

Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.

Online ISSN 1464-3529 - Print ISSN 0007-0955

Copyright ©  2011  Centre for Crime & Justice Studies (formerly ISTD)

Oxford Journals Oxford University Press

• Site Map
• Privacy Policy
• Frequently Asked Questions

via bjc.oxfordjournals.org