From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, searchTransparency International (TI) is a non-governmental organization that monitors and publicizes corporate and political corruption in international development. It publishes an annual Corruption Perceptions Index, a comparative listing of corruption worldwide. The headquarters is located in Berlin, Germany but operates through more than 70 national chapters.[1]
Contents
[hide][edit] History
TI was founded in May 1993 through the initiative of Peter Eigen, a former regional director for the World Bank. Founding board members included Eigen, Hansjörg Elshorst, Joe Githongo, Fritz Heimann, Michael Hershman, Kamal Hossain, Dolores L. Español, George Moody Stuart, Jerry Parfitt, Jeremy Pope and Frank Vogl.[2][3][4] Eigen acted as Chairman and Pope was Managing Director.[4]
In 1995, TI developed the Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI). The CPI ranked nations on the prevalence of corruption within each country, based upon surveys of business people. The CPI was subsequently published annually. It was criticized for poor methodology and unfair treatment of developing nations, while also being praised for highlighting corruption and embarrassing governments.[5]
In 1999, TI began publishing the Bribe Payers Index (BPI) which ranked nations according to the prevalence that a country's multinational corporations would offer bribes.[5]
[edit] Organization and role
TI is organized as a group of some 100 national chapters, with an international secretariat in Berlin, Germany. Originally founded in Germany in May 1993 as a not-for-profit organization, TI is now an international non-governmental organization, and claims to be moving towards a completely democratic organizational structure. TI says of itself:
"Transparency International is the global civil society organization leading the fight against corruption. It brings people together in a powerful worldwide coalition to end the devastating impact of corruption on men, women and children around the world. TI's mission is to create change towards a world free of corruption."
Since 1995, TI has issued an annual Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI); it also publishes an annual Global Corruption Report, a Global Corruption Barometer and a Bribe Payers Index.
TI does not undertake investigations on single cases of corruption or expose individual cases. It develops tools for fighting corruption and works with other civil society organizations, companies and governments to implement them. The goal of TI is to be non-partisan and to build coalitions against corruption.
TI's biggest success has been to put the topic of corruption on the world's agenda. International Institutions such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund now view corruption as one of the main obstacles for development, whereas prior to the 1990s this topic was not broadly discussed. TI furthermore played a vital role in the introduction of the United Nations Convention against Corruption and the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention.
[edit] Corruption Perceptions Index
Main article: Corruption Perceptions IndexThe CPI—besides the World Bank corruption index[6]—is the most commonly used measure for corruption in countries worldwide. To form this index, TI compiles surveys that ask businessmen and analysts, both in and outside the countries they are analyzing, their perceptions of how corrupt a country is. Relying on the number of actual corruption cases would not work since laws and enforcement of laws differ significantly from country to country.
The CPI has received criticisms over the years. The main one stems from the difficulty in measuring corruption, which by definition happens behind the scenes. The CPI therefore needs to rely on third-party survey which have been criticized as potentially unreliable. Data can vary widely depending on the public perception of a country, the completeness of the surveys and the methodology used. The second issue is that data cannot be compared from year to year because TI uses different methodologies and samples every year. This makes it difficult to evaluate the result of new policies.[7] The CPI authors replied to these criticims by reminding that the CPI is meant to measure perception and not "reality". They argue that "perceptions matter in their own right, since... firms and individuals take actions based on perceptions".[8]
[edit] Competitiveness and corruption
A review of the linkages between countries' competitiveness and the incidence of corruption was initiated at a TI workshop in Prague, November 1998 and picked-up in the International Anti-Corruption Conference three years later.[9]
Professor Mara Faccio, Hanna Chair in Entrepreneurship & Associate Professor of Finance at the Krannert School of Management at Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana USA has issued a number of papers on this subject, including a study entitled “Differences between Politically Connected and Non-Connected Firms: A Cross Country Comparison” [10]
[edit] See also
[edit] References
- ^ Kumar, Brij (March 1998). Ethics in International Management. Walter de Gruyter. p. 208. ISBN 978-3110154481.
- ^ "When and why was Transparency International (TI) founded?", FAQ, Transparency International
- ^ Hicks, Bill (2010). "Transparency International". Pinkindustry.com.
- ^ a b Larmour, Peter (September 2006). Bowden, Brett. ed. Global standards of market civilization. Routledge. pp. 95–106. ISBN 0415375452.
- ^ a b Chaikin, David (June 2009). Corruption and money laundering: a symbiotic relationship. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 12–13. ISBN 0230613608.
- ^ Anticorruption at web.worldbank.org
- ^ "A Users' Guide to Measuring Corruption". Global Integrity & UNDP. http://commons.globalintegrity.org/2008/09/users-guide-to-measuring-corruption.html.
- ^ Uslaner, Eric M. (2008). Corruption, inequality, and the rule of law: the bulging pocket makes the easy life. Cambridge University Press. pp. 11–17. ISBN 0521874890. http://books.google.com/books?id=TLvfSVkZYo4C&pg=PA11.
- ^ "tenth international anti-corruption conference: The Prague agenda" (in English) (HTML). Differences between Politically Connected and Non-Connected Firms: A Cross Country Comparison. Financial Management, Autumn 2010, vol 39(3), 905-927. doi:2002 November. http://10iacc.org/content.phtml?documents=400. Retrieved 2010 Dec 10.
- ^ "Differences between Politically Connected and Non-Connected Firms: A Cross Country Comparison" (in English) (HTML). Differences between Politically Connected and Non-Connected Firms: A Cross Country Comparison. Financial Management, Autumn 2010, vol 39(3), 905-927. doi:2010 November. http://www.krannert.purdue.edu/faculty/mfaccio/home.asp. Retrieved 2010 Dec 10.
[edit] External links
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_International"
The object of this blog began as a display of a varied amount of writings, scribblings and rantings that can be easily analysed by technology today to present the users with a clearer picture of the state of their minds, based on tests run on their input and their uses of the technology we are advocating with www.projectbrainsaver.com
Wednesday, 11 May 2011
Transparency International - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
via en.wikipedia.org
Flickr - projectbrainsaver
www.flickr.com
|