College hypocrisy: Pot’s bad, but party hard on booze - Chicago Sun-Times

College hypocrisy: Pot’s bad, but party hard on booze

By David Sirota September 16, 2011 10:52PM

• Reprints
• 18

Updated: September 18, 2011 2:30AM

In the firmament of celebrated Americana, there is Mom, apple pie, football and beer — but certainly not marijuana. Through our statutes, we allow law-abiding citizens to use only one recreational substance — alcohol — that just happens to be way more hazardous than pot.

Such idiocy is the product of many variables. There’s been interest-group maneuvering and temperance-movement hypocrisy. There’s been hippie-hating rage and reefer-madness paranoia. And, most invisibly, there’s been college.

Though little noticed for their role in America’s selective War on Drugs, universities have become a key player shotgunning the oxymoronic “alcohol is acceptable but pot is evil” mentality down the beer-bong-primed throats of America’s youth. Consider the University of Colorado.

CU is the higher education gem of a state whose governor made his millions on beer breweries. The school’s catering service sells alcohol and university officials license CU’s logo for use on beer-drinking merchandise. Meanwhile, every school year, CU forces kids to sit through a convocation in a beer-themed arena — the Coors Events Center — to learn about the “meaning and responsibilities” of student life.

Not surprisingly, CU now has a binge-drinking problem, as evidenced by last week’s news that another of its students died after a night of heavy imbibing.

This headline-grabbing tragedy — CU’s second such fatality in less than a decade — is but one of the 600,000 alcohol-related student injuries each year, according to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. But because (like other schools) CU is intertwined with alcohol culture, the university has danced around the issue.

Alcohol “is the cause or primary factor in [a majority] of suicides, unintentional deaths, physical injuries, distressed personal relationships, legal problems, sexual assault, property damage and academic failure,” CU’s assistant vice chancellor Donald Misch admitted in 2010. Yet, he refrained from an abstinence message, imploring students to “drink responsibly.”

This libertarian attitude seems laudable for appreciating the fact that kids will party regardless of prohibitionist rules. However, it is counterproductive in the context of the school’s no-tolerance posture toward marijuana — a substance that has been connected to far fewer injuries and no overdoses.

The Boulder Daily Camera newspaper reports that university regents have been looking to “crack down” on students’ unsanctioned “4/20” pro-pot protest because officials say it gives the school a “party image” — as if CU’s beer-soaked tailgating festivities don’t do that already.

While students over 21 may possess alcohol in university residences, the Camera reports that “CU bans marijuana in its dorms, even if students have medical licenses.”

CU embodies the norm in our universities, almost all of which have harsher penalties for marijuana possession than alcohol use.

Though students at more than a dozen schools across the country recently voted for referenda demanding administrators equalize punishments, the initiatives have been ignored. Instead, school officials are fighting to instill America’s destructive drug-war mentality in the next generation. The result is the perpetuation of a toxic ethos that encourages us to party hard, but only with a substance that is far more dangerous than marijuana.

David Sirota is the author of Back to Our Future: How the 1980s Explain the World We Live In Now.

salon.com

via suntimes.com